Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 17 de 17
Filtrar
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38716213

RESUMO

Background: Non-invasive tests (NITs) can be used to estimate the severity of fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) but their diagnostic accuracy is variable. Hispanic patients are at increased risk of NAFLD and diabetes. We evaluate the diagnostic performance of the fibrosis index based on 4 factors (FIB-4) in a population of Hispanic patients who underwent vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE). Methods: A total of 1,524 patients underwent VCTE at University of California, Los Angeles from July 18, 2019 to June 7, 2022. Ultimately 110 patients were identified as Hispanic, with confirmed NAFLD. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of FIB-4 threshold ≥1.3 were calculated. Logistic regression models were used to determine updated thresholds for patients with and without diabetes based on Youden's index. Results: Of the 110 patients, the majority (65%) were female. Prevalence of diabetes was higher in the group with clinically significant fibrosis (76% vs. 36%, P<0.001). Using a FIB-4 threshold ≥1.3 to predict clinically significant fibrosis (F2-F4 on VCTE), area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) was 0.74. By incorporating diabetes status, AUROC was 0.81 when employing a FIB-4 threshold of ≥1.0 in patients with diabetes and ≥1.5 in patients without diabetes. Conclusions: Using a FIB-4 threshold of ≥1.0 in patients with diabetes and ≥1.5 in patients without diabetes improves the diagnostic performance of the test. The new FIB-4 including diabetes status will lead to improved screening in patients who are at risk of clinically significant fibrosis.

2.
SAGE Open Med Case Rep ; 11: 2050313X231169841, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37151737

RESUMO

Tolvaptan is the current standard of treatment for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. It operates by acting on V2 receptors and blocks vasopressin interactions, causing a reduction in the rate of renal cyst growth and preserving kidney function. The current known risks of tolvaptan involve a serious liver injury characterized by an elevation in total bilirubin and alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase levels. In this report, we document a unique liver injury characterized by an elevated bilirubin with normal alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase levels in a patient who is homozygous for the UGT1A1 consistent with Gilbert syndrome.

3.
J Clin Exp Hepatol ; 13(3): 489-499, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36337085

RESUMO

Objectives: Post-COVID-19 cholangiopathy (PCC) is a rare but poorly understood and serious complication of COVID-19 infection. We sought to better understand the epidemiology, mechanism of action, histology, imaging findings, and outcomes of PCC. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science from December 2019 to December 2021. Mesh words used "post-Covid-19 cholangiopathy," "COVID-19 liver injury," "Covid-19 and cholangiopathy," and "COVID-19 liver disease." The data on epidemiology, mechanism of action, histology, imaging findings, and outcomes were collected. Results: PCC was reported in 30 cases during the study period. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 53.7 (5). Men accounted for cases (83.3%). All patients had required intensive level of care and mechanical ventilation. Mean (SD) number of days from COVID infection to severe disease or liver disease was 63.5 (38). Peak mean (SD) alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and total bilirubin were 2014 (831.8) U/L, 1555 (2432.8) U/L, 899.72 (1238.6) U/L, and 10.32 (9.32) mg/dl, respectively. Four patients successfully underwent liver transplantation. Conclusion: PCC is a severe and progressive complication of COVID-19 infection. More research is needed to better understand the pathophysiology and best treatment approach. Clinicians should suspect PCC in patients with cholestatic liver injury following COVID-19 infection.

4.
J Clin Transl Hepatol ; 8(2): 127-134, 2020 Jun 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32832392

RESUMO

Background and Aims: Being a caregiver for a patient with chronic liver disease (CLD) can be burdensome mentally, emotionally financially, and physically. The aim of this study was to systemically review the available tools and propose tools that can comprehensively evaluate caregiver burden for individuals caring for patients with CLD. Methods: We searched the PubMed database for all studies on the impact of patients with CLD on caregiver burden without timeframe restriction. Eligible studies included cohort studies, review studies, or cross-sectional studies. The number of patients and caregivers was isolated from each paper. Studies in the same categories were isolated and statistically compared. Results: A total of 13 studies meeting our inclusion criteria as stated in the methods sections were included. In total, 2528 caregivers were taking care of 2003 patients with CLD. Women made up the majority of caregivers at 78.2%, 95.7% of whom identified as the patient's spouse. Caregiver strain index is one of the most comprehensive tools; however, the questions are very general and do not fully elucidate financial strain. Beck depression and anxiety were correlated (p=0.0001), and both depression and anxiety were correlated with perceived caregiver burden (PCB) and Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) (p=0.002). Depression scale correlated with Interpersonal Support Evaluation - Short Form, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score correlated with ZBI and PCB (total and in most domains; p=0.001). Patient's poorer cognitive performance correlated with higher ZBI and PCB (employed patients had higher cognitive performance and lower ZBI and PCB). Conclusions: Caregiver burden remains poorly understood due to the lack of uniformity in the assessment tools used to evaluate caregiver burden. None of the tools used to evaluate caregiver burden are comprehensive; however, most tools correlate statistically in the ability to identify caregiver burden. A comprehensive tool is lacking for identifying caregiver burden in patients with CLD.

5.
Curr Opin Gastroenterol ; 36(3): 157-163, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32101986

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Alcoholic liver disease continues to be a major public health concern in the United States and around the world. Alcoholic liver disease remains the third most common indication for liver transplantation in the United States. Mortality has been reported in up to 30-50% of patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis. Liver transplantation can be lifesaving for patients with alcoholic hepatitis. Liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease was traditionally only considered in patients who have achieved 6 months of abstinence. The majority of patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis who fail medical therapy will not live long enough to meet this requirement. The purpose of this review is to provide an update from the most recent peer reviewed articles regarding early liver transplantation of alcoholic hepatitis. RECENT FINDINGS: This review shows that liver transplantation offers the best survival benefit to patients with alcoholic hepatitis. Selection criteria is a key component for a successful transplant. No change in 1-year graft survival between patients who have 6 months sobriety vs. those transplanted prior to 6 months abstinence. Liver transplantation is limited by very narrow selection criteria and limited long-term data. SUMMARY: Liver transplantation offers the best survival benefit to patients with alcoholic hepatitis. Selection criteria of patients has evolved and have become more permissive and the period of sobriety has become less important in the evaluation of process. However, long-term outcomes continue to lack in the literature. On the basis of previous studies, patients with longer pretransplant abstinence, disease process insight, older age at the time of transplant, the presence of social support that lives with the patient in the same dwelling place were noted to have lower rates of return to alcohol use after liver transplantation.


Assuntos
Hepatite Alcoólica/cirurgia , Transplante de Fígado , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/efeitos adversos , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Hepatite Alcoólica/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite Alcoólica/etiologia , Hepatite Alcoólica/mortalidade , Humanos , Hepatopatias Alcoólicas/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatopatias Alcoólicas/etiologia , Hepatopatias Alcoólicas/mortalidade , Hepatopatias Alcoólicas/cirurgia , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Fígado/mortalidade , Seleção de Pacientes , Prognóstico , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
6.
ACG Case Rep J ; 6(10): e00252, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31832473

RESUMO

We describe a woman with no previous liver disease who developed drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis from hydralazine prescribed to her for hypertension. Despite the discontinuation of the medication, she developed acute liver failure and subsequently underwent successful liver transplantation. She survived and had a good clinical outcome.

7.
Thromb J ; 17: 18, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31516395

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome is a rare group of disorders that have in common underlying complement amplifying conditions. These conditions can accelerate complement activation that results in a positive feedback cycle. The known triggers for complement activation can be diverse and include, infection, autoimmune disease, and malignancy. Recent reports suggest that certain autoimmune and rheumatological triggers of complement activation may result in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome that does not resolve despite treating the underlying disorder. Specifically, patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and microangiopathic hemolysis may not respond to treatment of their underlying rheumatological trigger but responded to complement blockade. CASE PRESENTATIONS: We report two patients with inflammatory bowel disease complicated by development of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. In both cases, patients were on treatment for inflammatory bowel disease, that was not well controlled/flaring at the time. The first patient is a male who developed Crohn's disease and microangiopathic hemolysis at age 5 and was treated with eculizumab successfully. Discontinuation of the medication led to multiple relapses, and the patient currently is being treated with eculizumab and has normal hematological and stable renal parameters. The second patient is a 49-year-old female with Ulcerative Colitis treated with 6-Mercaptopurine. She developed acute kidney injury and microangiopathic hemolysis. Prompt diagnosis and treatment with eculizumab resulted in the recovery of kidney injury along with a complete hematological response. CONCLUSIONS: These two cases are the fifth and sixth patients to be published in the literature with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease treated with complement blockade. This confirms that C5 complement blockade is effective in treating complement mediated thrombotic microangiopathy/atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome when it is triggered in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

8.
Clin Liver Dis ; 23(4): 607-623, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31563214

RESUMO

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cirrhosis. The impact of HE on the health care system is similarly profound. The number of hospital admissions for HE has increased in the last 10-year period. HE is a huge burden to the patients, care givers, and the health care system. HE represents a "revolving door" with readmission, severely affects care givers, and has effects on cognition that can persists after liver transplant. This article reviews the current literature to discuss the challenges and diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to HE.


Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/uso terapêutico , Encefalopatia Hepática/terapia , Desintoxicação por Sorção/métodos , Aminoácidos de Cadeia Ramificada/uso terapêutico , Amônia/metabolismo , Cuidadores , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Dipeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Encefalopatia Hepática/diagnóstico , Encefalopatia Hepática/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Lactulose/uso terapêutico , Neomicina/uso terapêutico , Readmissão do Paciente , Rifaximina/uso terapêutico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Benzoato de Sódio/uso terapêutico , Zinco/uso terapêutico
9.
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl ; 30(4): 989-994, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31464262

RESUMO

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are used in renal sparing protocols and transplant immunosuppression in patients with solid organ and stem cell transplants. They cause various side effects, including proteinuria, which is mediated by blockade of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor pathway. There have been various reports of mTOR inhibitors causing proteinuria or worsening proteinuria form preexisting renal glomerulo-pathies. We report a 73-year old male with diabetic glomerulosclerosis, acute liver failure due to Budd-Chiari syndrome, chronic low platelets, and worsening proteinuria from 0.46 g protein/g creatinine to 2.2 g protein/g creatinine. Workup revealed no thrombotic microangiopathy through skin biopsy, and a renal biopsy confirmed only clinically suspected diabetic and hypertensive glomerulosclerosis and possible calcineurin inhibitors. On discontinuation of everolimus urine protein decreased back to 0.6 g/g creatinine. We review the mechanism of mTOR-induced proteinuria and how this may affect diabetic nephropathy secondarily. We also consider the clinical implications of this in transplant patients receiving these agents.


Assuntos
Nefropatias Diabéticas/complicações , Everolimo/efeitos adversos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Falência Hepática Aguda/cirurgia , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Proteinúria/etiologia , Idoso , Nefropatias Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Nefropatias Diabéticas/urina , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Falência Hepática Aguda/complicações , Falência Hepática Aguda/diagnóstico , Masculino , Proteinúria/diagnóstico , Proteinúria/urina , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Clin Liver Dis ; 23(3): 463-472, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31266620

RESUMO

Epidemiologic studies suggest that 10% to 15% of patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) are coinfected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) in the United States as a result of the shared modality of transmission, but the true prevalence is not known. The progression of liver disease to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma is generally faster in patients who are coinfected, and HCV is usually more predominant. Immunosuppression of the host or eradication of hepatitis C can change this paradigm, causing hepatitis B reactivation. This review describes HCV-HBV viral interactions, risks for reactivation, screening, and society guidelines for surveillance and treatment.


Assuntos
Coinfecção/epidemiologia , Progressão da Doença , Hepatite B/epidemiologia , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Cirrose Hepática/virologia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patologia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/fisiopatologia , Coinfecção/diagnóstico , Comorbidade , Feminino , Hepacivirus/isolamento & purificação , Hepatite B/diagnóstico , Vírus da Hepatite B/isolamento & purificação , Hepatite C/diagnóstico , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/epidemiologia , Cirrose Hepática/patologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Masculino , Prevalência , Medição de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos
12.
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) ; 15(2): 93-99, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31011303

RESUMO

Background: Despite the availability of hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination, HBV remains a cause of significant morbidity and mortality around the world. Immunologic response and the development of immunity to the HBV vaccine vary significantly among patients. Multiple studies have looked at patients who are at risk of nonresponse and have offered their own approaches to patients who do not respond. This article reviews the best approaches to HBV vaccine nonresponse. Methods: We searched the PubMed database for all articles on HBV vaccination response from 1981 to January 2018. Recommended and tested approaches to nonresponse were identified. Results: A total of 71 adequate-quality studies with 2354 patients were identified. Repeat vaccination with the same dose increased immunologic seroconversion in 85.7% of patients who previously reported nonresponse and in over 80% of patients with end-stage renal disease, HIV infection, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, advanced age, hypoalbuminemia, liver cirrhosis, and hemodialysis (HD) dependence. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, and diabetes had a milder response (67.5%). Increasing the vaccination dose to 40 µg improved seroconversion in HIV-infected, HCV-infected, and HD patients of initial nonresponse. The use of a subcutaneous injection route increased response by 12% in patients infected with HIV. Conclusion: Patients not responding to an initial vaccine series and not actively infected with HBV benefited from reimmunization by repeating the vaccine series or receiving a single-dose vaccine booster. Although the overall response rate was approximately 90% of previous nonresponders, the rate varied among the populations studied.

13.
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) ; 14(8): 459-462, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30302060

RESUMO

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening is traditionally performed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and HCV infection is confirmed by measuring the viral load using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). An alternative screening approach is to use only PCR, without the ELISA pretest. Methods: We compared the cost ratio of screening for HCV using 2 approaches: (1) ELISA followed by PCR testing, and (2) PCR testing alone. The results were analyzed using a decision analysis model. A sensitivity analysis and a threshold analysis were performed by varying both the prevalence of HCV infection (to encompass populations in which viral infection is overrepresented) as well as the costs of PCR testing. Results: Under baseline assumptions, the costs of PCR testing alone were substantially greater than the combination of ELISA and PCR testing. The cost per patient screened using combination testing was $42.30, whereas testing with only PCR cost $200.00 per patient. The prevalence of HCV had a greater impact on the cost ratio than did the costs of laboratory tests. The use of PCR testing alone became less costly only when the prevalence of HCV infection was greater than 69.5%. Otherwise, the costs of the 2 approaches were similar when the cost of PCR was 1% of that of ELISA. Conclusion: From a pharmacoeconomic basis, the current approach of HCV screening (ie, using ELISA and PCR testing) was found to be the less expensive screening strategy in a general US population and for most cohorts in which HCV infection was noted to be overrepresented. Screening for HCV is less costly using solely PCR testing only when the prevalence of HCV infection is greater than 69.5%.

14.
Dig Dis Sci ; 63(12): 3480-3486, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30259281

RESUMO

AIM: Results of recent studies have confirmed the efficacy of an 8-week course of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) in patients who are non-cirrhotics, native to treatment, are infected with hepatitis C (HCV) genotype 1, and have HCV viral load < 6 million IU/mL. However, there are limited data on a shortened treatment course in patients who are over the age of 65. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed to examine the safety, tolerability, and sustained viral response rates (SVR) of the 8-week LDV/SOF therapy compared to the 12-week LDV/SOF therapy among non-cirrhotic, treatment-naïve, genotype 1 HCV patients with viral load < 6 million IU/mL who are 65 years of age or older. RESULTS: A total of 454 patients were identified of which 182 non-cirrhotic, genotype 1 HCV-RNA < 6 million IU/mL patients received the 8-week LDV/SOF treatment and 272 received the 12-week LDV/SOF treatment. Mean [± standard deviation (SD)] aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index score for the entire cohort was 0.45 ± 0.03. The mean (± SD) age for the 8-week treatment was 69.7 (± 7) years, 54.7% male and 45.3% female. The mean (± SD) age of the 12-week treatment was 71.7 (± 3) years, 56.4% male and 43.6% female. Overall, SVR-12 for the 8-week regimen was 93% and SVR-12 for the 12-week regimen was 95%. For the 182 treated with the 8-week LDV/SOF treatment, there were no serious adverse events requiring hospitalization or signs of liver failure requiring transplantation. Overall, the 8-week treatment patient cohort experienced less fatigue, headache, dry mouth, and diarrhea. This finding was statistically significant with a P value < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Eight-week LDV/SOF therapy in treatment-naive, non-cirrhotic, genotype 1 HCV patients with RNA < 6 million IU/mL was found safe, better tolerated, effective, and required less upfront cost when compared with the 12-week LDV/SOF treatment regimen in properly selected geriatric population.


Assuntos
Benzimidazóis , Fluorenos , Hepacivirus , Hepatite C , Uridina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Benzimidazóis/administração & dosagem , Benzimidazóis/efeitos adversos , California/epidemiologia , Feminino , Fluorenos/administração & dosagem , Fluorenos/efeitos adversos , Hepacivirus/efeitos dos fármacos , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatite C/diagnóstico , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Hepatite C/virologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sofosbuvir , Resposta Viral Sustentada , Resultado do Tratamento , Uridina Monofosfato/administração & dosagem , Uridina Monofosfato/efeitos adversos , Carga Viral/efeitos dos fármacos , Carga Viral/métodos
15.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 52(10): 908-912, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29334502

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Direct acting antiviral (DAA) agents are the standard of care for treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected individuals. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation during HCV treatment has been reported, the incidence and clinical outcome remains unclear. The aim of our study is to examine the risk of HBV reactivation in actively infected or previously exposed patients during or after HCV treatment with DAAs. METHODS: Adults with chronic HCV infection previously exposed or actively infected with HBV and treated with DAAs between December 2015 to 2016 were included. Electronic medical records were reviewed for HCV treatment dates, HCV treatment response, DAA used, HBV status, and concurrent HBV treatment. Primary end-point was to determine the risk of HBV reactivation during or up to 3 months after DAA treatment. RESULTS: We identified 283 patients, and 100% of patients completed HCV treatment with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir. 93% had HCV genotype-1 of whom 91% achieved sustained viral response at 12 weeks posttreatment (SVR-12). In total, 7% had HCV genotype-4 who achieved SVR-12 of 84%. Mean (±SD) age was 59.7 (±7) years, and 58% were male. A total of 45% of patients had hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) positive and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative. In total, 55% of patients had a positive HBsAg before HCV DAA treatment. No HBV reactivation was encountered in the (HBcAb) positive HBsAg-negative cohort nor in the (HBsAg) positive group with 95% confidence interval (0-0.023) and (0-0.019), respectively. CONCLUSION: In our study of patients with HCV and isolated hepatitis B core or HBsAg positivity, no HCV patients treated with DAA experienced HBV reactivation.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Benzimidazóis/administração & dosagem , Fluorenos/administração & dosagem , Hepatite B , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Uridina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antivirais/farmacologia , California/epidemiologia , Coinfecção , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite B/sangue , Antígenos de Superfície da Hepatite B/imunologia , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Sofosbuvir , Uridina Monofosfato/administração & dosagem , Ativação Viral , Adulto Jovem
16.
World J Gastroenterol ; 23(26): 4759-4766, 2017 Jul 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28765697

RESUMO

AIM: To evaluate sustained viral response (SVR) of 8-wk ledipasvir/sofosbuvir therapy among non-cirrhotic, genotype-1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients with RNA < 6 million IU/mL. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study to examine SVR rates, predictors of treatment failure and safety analysis of 8-wk ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) therapy among non-cirrhotic, genotype 1 HCV patients with viral load < 6 million IU/mL. Primary outcome was an achievement of SVR at 12 wk after treatment. Secondary outcomes were identifying predictors of treatment failure and adverse events during treatment. RESULTS: Total 736 patients: 55% males, 51% Caucasians and 65% were genotype 1a. Non-cirrhotic state of 53% was determined by clinical judgment (imaging, AST, platelet count) and 47% had documented liver fibrosis testing (biopsy, vibration-controlled transient elastography, serum biomarkers). Overall SVR12 was 96%. No difference in SVR12 was seen between patients whose non-cirrhotic state was determined by clinical judgment and patients who had fibrosis testing. Age groups, gender, ethnicity and genotype 1 subtype did not predict SVR. Non-cirrhotic state determined by clinical judgment based on simple, non-invasive tests were not associated with lower SVR [OR = 1.02, 95%CI: 0.48-2.17, P = 0.962]. The AUROC for hepatitis C RNA viral load was 0.734 (P < 0.001, 95%CI: 0.66-0.82). HCV RNA 2.2 million IU/mL was identified as the cutoff value with sensitivity 73% and specificity 64%. HCV RNA < 2.2 million IU/mL was associated with significantly higher SVR 98% with OR = 0.22 (95%CI: 0.1-0.49, P < 0.001) compared to SVR 92% in HCV RNA ≥ 2.2 million IU/mL. No death or morbidities were reported. CONCLUSION: Our outcomes validate safety and effectiveness of 8-wk LDV/SOF therapy in non-cirrhotic, untreated HCV genotype 1 patients with HCV RNA < 6 million IU/mL.


Assuntos
Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Benzimidazóis/administração & dosagem , Fluorenos/administração & dosagem , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Uridina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Benzimidazóis/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Fluorenos/efeitos adversos , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatite C Crônica/virologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sofosbuvir , Resposta Viral Sustentada , Uridina Monofosfato/administração & dosagem , Uridina Monofosfato/efeitos adversos , Carga Viral , Adulto Jovem
17.
Perm J ; 21: 16-096, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28368787

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Traditional hepatitis C virus treatment was limited by low cure rates, side effects, and stringent monitoring requirements. Sofosbuvir, a direct-acting antiviral agent with a cure rate of 96%, was introduced in 2013. However, trials frequently excluded patients with advanced liver disease and prior treatment experience. This study aims to elucidate the real-world cure rates and sofosbuvir safety profile. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Kaiser Permanente Southern California involving patients with hepatitis C virus who received sofosbuvir treatment. Patients age 18 years and older were included, and pregnant patients were excluded. The primary end point was sustained virologic response at 12 weeks posttreatment. Secondary end points were safety and medication adherence. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to compare patients with genotypes 1 and 2 infections. RESULTS: Of the 213 study patients, 42.3% had cirrhosis, and 38% were treatment-experienced. Most patients (69.5%) received dual therapy (sofosbuvir + ribavirin), whereas the remainder (30.5%) received triple therapy (sofosbuvir + ribavirin + interferon). The overall rate of sustained virologic response at 12 weeks posttreatment rate was 72.9% for genotype 1 infection, 64.7% in the treatment-experienced subgroup, and 66.7% in the cirrhosis subgroup. Rates of sustained virologic response at 12 weeks posttreatment for genotypes 2 and 3 were 90.8% and 55%, respectively. Most patients experienced anemia and fatigue. Women and patients with a lower baseline viral load were statistically more likely to be cured. CONCLUSION: Real-world cure rates were similar to rates seen in clinical trials for genotype 2 infection and lower for genotype 1 infection. Patients with genotype 1 and 3 infection did better with triple therapy compared with dual therapy. Patients tolerated therapy well with side effects, serious adverse events, and discontinuation rates similar to clinical trials. Women and patients with lower baseline hepatitis C viral load were more likely to achieve sustained virological response at 12 weeks posttreatment.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Hepacivirus , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Fígado/efeitos dos fármacos , Sofosbuvir/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Anemia/etiologia , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , California , Quimioterapia Combinada , Fadiga/etiologia , Feminino , Genótipo , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatite C Crônica/virologia , Humanos , Interferons/uso terapêutico , Fígado/patologia , Cirrose Hepática/tratamento farmacológico , Cirrose Hepática/virologia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ribavirina/uso terapêutico , Fatores Sexuais , Sofosbuvir/efeitos adversos , Carga Viral
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...